Ontologia

Short-eared Dog

Atelocynus microtis(Sclater, 1883)

NTLR Monde (IUCN)
  1. Animal
  2. Chordata
  3. Mammalia
  4. Carnivora
  5. Canidae
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Atelocynus microtis.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

NT · Quasi menacéeDécroissante
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2011 · v3.1
Altitude
2000 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert

The Short-eared Dog is notoriously rare, and sightings are uncommon across its range. However, this may not always have been the case. The first biologists to study the species found it relatively easy to trap during mammal surveys around Balta, Amazonian Peru, in 1969 (A.L. Gardner and J.L. Patton pers. comm.). Grimwood (1969) reported collecting specimens around the same time in Peru's Manu basin (now Manu National Park), suggesting that the species was also relatively common in that area.

Following these reports, the species went practically unrecorded in the Peruvian Amazon until 1987, despite intensive, long-term field surveys of mammals in the intervening years (Terborgh et al. 1984; Janson and Emmons 1990; Woodman et al. 1991; Pacheco et al. 1993, 1995). Even Louise Emmons, who carried out long-term monitoring and trapping of Ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) and other mammals at the Cocha Cashu Biological Station in Manu, never saw or trapped the Short-eared Dog (L. Emmons pers. comm. 2008). For whatever reason, the species appears to have gone entirely unrecorded from the region between 1970 and 1987.

This local and temporary disappearance is potentially related to transmission of diseases by domestic dogs, commonly brought by local indigenous into protected areas. Two disease surveys carried out in Manu National Park found parvovirus and distemper to be common among domestic dogs, posing a threat to Short-eared Dog populations and other carnivores inside Manu and Alto Purus National Park (Schenck et al. 1997; Leite Pitman, Nieto et al. 2003).

Over the last two decades, it appears that the species population may be recovering in some areas, with increasing numbers of sightings in recent years, but which also certainly reflects a greater number of biologists and tourists in the region and improvements in detection technology such as the use of camera-traps. Between 1987 and 1999, biologists working in the Peruvian department of Madre de Dios, mostly in the vicinity of Cocha Cashu Biological Station, reported 15 Short-eared Dog sightings. Surveys in Cocha Cashu conducted from 2000–2003 resulted in a few brief encounters, while surveys around the Curanja and Purus rivers found tracks in every creek visited (M.R.P. Leite Pitman pers. obs.). From 2003 to date, more than 100 camera-trap pictures of this species have been recorded at Los Amigos Biological Station, also in south-eastern Peru (M.R.P. Leite Pitman pers. obs.). The species has also been recorded by camera traps in northern Peru, Colombia, Ecuador, Bolivia and western and eastern Brazil.

Menaces identifiées(7 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 2_1_3
    Agro-industry farming
    Slow, Significant DeclinesOngoing
  • 2_1_1
    Shifting agriculture
    Ongoing
  • 2_1_2
    Small-holder farming
    Ongoing
  • 2_3_3
    Agro-industry grazing, ranching or farming
    Ongoing
  • 5_1_2
    Unintentional effects (species is not the target)
    Ongoing
  • 5_3_4
    Unintentional effects: (large scale) [harvest]
    Ongoing
  • 8_1_1
    Unspecified species
    Ongoing
Description complète des menacesExpert

The major threats to this species are habitat loss (especially due to large-scale conversion currently underway in Amazonia), prey-base depletion from hunting, and diseases. There are no reports of widespread persecution of the species.

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 1_6Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland
  • 1_8Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Swamp
  • 5_1Wetlands (inland) - Permanent Rivers/Streams/Creeks (includes waterfalls)
  • 5_4Wetlands (inland) - Bogs, Marshes, Swamps, Fens, Peatlands
  • 2_1Savanna - Dry
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert

Although protected on paper in most range countries, this has not yet been backed up by specific conservation action, although the species’ presence was a major factor for conservation efforts at Jamari National Forest, western Brazil (Koester et al. 2008).

The Short-eared Dog is likely to occur in most protected areas that encompass large tracts of undisturbed forest in western Amazonia. During the last decade, its presence has been confirmed in protected areas in Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador and Peru. 

The species is not included in the CITES Appendices.

No animals currently are known to be in formal captive breeding programmes. In the past, individuals have been held in several U.S. zoos (including the Lincoln Park Zoo, the National Zoo, the Brookfield Zoo, the Oklahoma City Zoo, and the San Antonio Zoo), mostly during the 1960s and 1970s (Leite Pitman and Williams 2004).

The biology, pathology, and ecology of the species are little known. Especially lacking is any true estimate of population density and an understanding of the species' habitat requirements. New GPS tracking technology will facilitate studies on density, habitat use and home-range.

Actions de conservation (3)Expert
  • 2_1Site/area management
  • 2_2Invasive/problematic species control
  • 5_4_2National level
Stress écologiques (12)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_3_7Reduced reproductive success
Usage & commerce (1)Expert
  • 13Pets/display animals, horticulture
    subsistance
Priorités de recherche (2)Expert
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 1_3Life history & ecology
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Neotropical

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial
Références bibliographiques (25)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (ver. 2011.2). Available at: <a href="http://www.iucnredlist.org">http://www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 10 November 2011).
  2. Koester, A.D., Azevedo, C.R., Vogliotti, A. and Duarte, J.M.B. 2008. Ocorrência de <i>Atelocynus microtis</i> (Sclater, 1882) na Floresta Nacional do Jamari, estado de Rondônia. <i>Biota Neotropica</i> 8(4): 231-234.
  3. Leite Pitman, M.R.P. and Williams, R.S.R. 2004. The short-eared dog (<i>Atelocynus microtis</i>). In: C. Sillero-Zubiri, M. Hoffmann and D.W. Macdonald (eds), <i>Canids: Foxes, Wolves and Dogs. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan, second edition</i>, pp. 26-31. IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK.
  4. Leite Pitman, M.R.P., Beck, H. and Velazco, P. 2003. Mamíferos terrestres y arbóreos de la selva baja de la Amazonía peruana entre los ríos Manu y Alto Purú. In: M.R.P. Leite Pitman, N.C.A. Pitman and P.C. Alvarez (eds), <i>Alto Purús: Biodiversidad, Conservación y Manejo</i>, pp. 109-122. Center for Tropical Conservation and INRENA.
  5. Leite Pitman, M.R.P., Nieto, F.V. and Davenport, L. 2003. Amenaza de enfermedades epidémicas a la conservación de carnívoros silvestres en la Amazonía peruan. In: M.R.P. Leite Pitman, N.C.A. Pitman and P.C. Alvarez (eds), <i>Alto Purús: Biodiversidad, Conservación y Manejo</i>, pp. 227-231. Center for Tropical Conservation and INRENA.
  6. Pereira, A.P.C.P. 2002. Ecologia alimentar do cuxiú-preto (<i>Chiropotes satanas satanas</i>) na Fazenda Amanda, Pará. Mestrado em Teoria e Pesquisa do Comportamento, Universidade Federal do Pará.
  7. Pitman, N., Moskovits, D. K., Alverson, W. S. and Borman. A. 2002. Ecuador: Serranías Cofán-Bermejo, Sinangoe. Rapid biological Inventories. Report 3. The Field Museum, Chicago, USA.
  8. Tirira, D. 1999. <i>Mamiferos del Ecaudor</i>. Museo de Zoologia, Centro de Biodiversidad y Ambiente, Pontifica Universidad Católica del Ecaudor and Sociedad para la Investigación y Monitoreo de la Biodiversidad Ecuatoriana, Quito, Ecuador.
  9. Rodriguez, J. V. 1998. <i>Listas preliminares de mamíferos colombianos con algún riesgo a la extinción</i>.
  10. Emmons, L.H. and Feer, F. 1997. <i>Neotropical Rainforest Mammals: A Field Guide, Second edition</i>. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.
  11. Schenck, C., Staib, E. and Storch I. 1997. Domestic animal disease risks for Peruvian Giant Otters (<i>Pteronura brasiliensis</i>). <i>IUCN Veterinary Specialist Group Newsletter</i> 14: 7-8.
  12. Baillie, J. and Groombridge, B. (comps and eds). 1996. <i>1996 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals</i>. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
  13. Pacheco, V., de Macedo, H., Vivar, E., Ascorra, C.F., Arana-Cardó, R. and Solari, S. 1995. Lista anotada de los mamíferos peruanos. <i>Occasional Papers in Conservation Biology</i> 2: 1-35.
  14. Groombridge, B. (ed.). 1994. <i>IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals</i>. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
  15. Pacheco, V., Patterson, B. D., Patton, J. L., Emmons, L. H., Solari, S. and Ascorra, C. F. 1993. List of mammal species known to occur in Manu Biosphere Reserve, Peru. <i>Publicaciones del Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos</i> 44: 1-12.
  16. Woodman, N., Timm, R. M., Arana-Cardo, R., Pacheco, V., Schmidt, C. A., Hooper, E. D. and Pacheco-Acero, C. 1991. Annotated checklist of the mammals of Cuzco Amazonico, Peru. <i>Occasional papers of the Museum of Natural History, the University of Kansas</i> 145: 1-12.
  17. Janson, C.H. and Emmons, L.H. 1990. Ecological structure of the nonflying mammal community at Cocha Cashu Biological Station, Manu National Park, Peru. In: A.H. Gentry (ed.), <i>Four neotropical forests</i>, pp. 314-338. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
  18. IUCN. 1990. <i>IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals</i>. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
  19. Emmons, L.H. and Feer, F. 1990. <i>Neotropical Rainforest Mammals: a Field Guide</i>. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA and London, UK.
  20. IUCN Conservation Monitoring Centre. 1986. <i>1986 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals</i>. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
  21. Berta, A. 1986. Atelocynus microtis. <i>Mammalian Species</i> 256: 1-3.
  22. Terborgh, J., Fitzpatrick, J. W. and Emmons, L. 1984. Annotated checklist of bird and mammal species of Cocha Cashu Biological Station, Manu National Park, Peru. <i>Fieldiana: Zoology</i> 21: 1-29.
  23. Thornback, J. and Jenkins, M. 1982. <i>The IUCN Mammal Red Data Book. Part 1: Threatened mammalian taxa of the Americas and the Australasian zoogeographic region (excluding Cetacea)</i>. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
  24. Grimwood, I.R. 1969. Notes on the distribution and status of some Peruvian mammals. Special Publication Number 21. American Committee for International Wild Life Protection and New York Society, Bronx, New York, USA.
  25. Hershkovitz, P. 1961. On the South American small-eared zorro <i>Atelocynus microtis</i> Sclater (Canidae). <i>Fieldiana: Zoology</i> 39: 505-523.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (2)Expert
assessor
Leite-Pitman, M.R.P. & Williams, R.S.R.
evaluator
Sillero-Zubiri, C. & Hoffmann, M.

Leite-Pitman, M.R.P. & Williams, R.S.R. 2011. Atelocynus microtis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2011: e.T6924A12814890. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Traits biologiques

20 valeurs · 5 sources

Morphologie(4)

Masse adulte
9,5 kg
AnAge
Longueur
-999 mm
PanTHERIA
Masse naissance
-999000 mg
PanTHERIA
Masse au sevrage
-999000 mg
PanTHERIA

Cycle de vie(1)

Longévité max
12 ans
AnAge
Voir 15 traits de plus (2 catégories)

Reproduction(6)

Gestation
-999 j
PanTHERIA
Intervalle naissances
-999 j
PanTHERIA
Taille de portée
-999
PanTHERIA
Portées par an
-999
PanTHERIA
Maturité sexuelle
-999 j
PanTHERIA
Sevrage
-999 j
PanTHERIA

Écologie & habitat(9)

Fruits (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Invertébrés (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Nectar (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Autre végétal (%)
20 %
elton_mammals
Charognard (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Graines (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Vert. ectothermes (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Vert. endothermes (%)
80 %
elton_mammals
Poissons (%)
0 %
elton_mammals

Sources priorisées par qualité scientifique (peer-reviewed spécialisées → Wikidata fallback). Unités auto-converties, valeur max retenue en cas de mesures multiples. Méthodologie · Citations.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Bibliographie

Note nomenclaturale & synonymesExpert

Note nomenclaturale

TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHN

Synonymes (5)— redirigent vers cette page

  • Atelocynus microtis microtis(Sclater, 1883)
  • Atelocynus microtis sclateri(J. A. Allen, 1905)
  • Canis macrotisSclater, 1883
  • Canis microtisSclater, 1883
  • Dusicyon microtis(Sclater, 1883)

Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).